Twitter Grader Part 4

Social Media

by Kenny Hyder

It has been awhile since I have cove­red the chan­ges at twitter.grader.com, and I know there was quite a bit of acti­vity while I was aloof.

Shortly after my last post, I was con­tac­ted by seve­ral friends on twit­ter that their gra­des had shot up sig­ni­fi­cantly (mine at one point was up to a 95.8 from a 90) and then shortly after, a quick dec­line. I spe­cu­la­ted that this was all due to more algo upda­tes, which was later con­fir­med by Dhar­mesh, the man behind the mad­ness at Twit­ter Gra­der. So I deci­ded to let things settle a bit before chec­king out the next round of updates.

Here are the charts:

Upda­ted:
Recip Grader Followers

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pre­vious:

Recip Grader Followers

 

 

 

 

 

 

So, pretty much across the board, sco­res have risen con­sis­tently with inc­rea­ses in follo­wer counts, and ratios of follo­wers to follo­wing. So if there has been all the cons­tant upda­ting but no chan­ges, what gives? I think its all about the ove­rall rank. This is something that up until this point, I haven’t tal­ked about, but I have noti­ced that these sco­red seem to have leve­led out quite a bit.

It used to be that there were mul­ti­ple ties for posi­tions (5 peo­ple could be #1) and the sco­ring didn’t make a whole lot of sense in this arena. But if you take a look at the twit­ter elite page, we see that there is now a neatly groo­med list of the top 100 twit­ter users. (Quick shout out to recip follo­wers @garyvee and @problogger who are on the list!)
The ove­rall ran­kings also clearly dis­tin­guish the twit­ter users on my list as well. The duel bet­ween mar­tin­bow­ling and oil­man is a mere .2 in twit­ter grade due to martinbowling’s close count of follo­wers, but he is far outsha­do­wed in ove­rall rank with oilman’s ove­rall rank of 615 to his 1,334. There are even sig­ni­fi­cant gaps bet­ween users with iden­ti­cal gra­des, as in the case of chris­win­field vs. davesny­der — 449 to 777 (go buy a lotto tic­ket dave). 

This ove­rall rank is a good abso­lute sys­tem, in terms of an arbi­trary twit­ter rank, although it still lacks in the depart­ment in that it only accounts for pro­fi­les that have been sub­mit­ted to Twit­ter Gra­der. Which is why I think users are still going to Twit­ter “Grade” more. It is more self suf­fi­cient. But, I would still like to see some impro­ve­ments made on this sys­tem. Pos­si­ble things to con­si­der? Ret­weets & men­tions @ search.twitter.com. And for the ove­rall rank, can you start craw­ling twit­ter? ;)

Peo­ple men­tio­ned in this post:

  • Mar­tin Bow­ling aka @martinbowling
  • Todd Frie­sen aka @oilman
  • Dave Sny­der aka @davesnyder
  • Kate Morris aka @katemorris
  • David Brown aka @NeOBlog
  • Chris Win­field aka @chriswinfield
  • Frank Watson aka @AussieWebmaster
  • Robert Pal­mer aka @robertpalmer
  • Kenny Hyder aka @kennyhyder
  • Aus­tin Cur­tis aka @austincurtis
  • PS: If you liked this post, FOLLOW ME :)

    { 1 comment }

    rvtwt August 3, 2009 at 10:30 pm

    It looks to me like youve just got a CSS problem, not a javascript problem. Adding:.textwidget{background: #FFFFFF;}to your stylesheet should give you the white background, but if you want it to look exactly like the other widgets, (with rouned corners and same fonts) youll need to make sure the textwidget class has the same css as sidebar ul.If you need a better explanation or just want me to fix it for you fill free to email me.

    Previous post:

    Next post: